Parcours

Specific Parcour modules are developed with industrial relevance to simulate realistic work processes. A single professional user runs each Parcour
twice – once with exoskeleton and once without exoskeleton. The exoskeleton as well as the task execution with and without exoskeleton are randomly assigned to the participants.

A detailed description of the background and methodology of Exoworkathlon is in the paper "Exoworkathlon: A prospective study approach for the evaluation of industrial exoskeletons" by Kopp et al. 2022.

Different methods of evaluation are used. Subjective user feedback scoring is a key element. A comparison of intra-individual differences is generated. The exoskeleton manufacturers, that have already participated, are mentioned but the specific exoskeleton used is kept anonymously in the output statistics.

Assessments

Assessments

The assessment methods include subjective feedback in the specific task, user comfort during wearing an exoskeleton, an analysis of ergonomic aspects and quality of work. The following table lists the various assessments and assigns them to the three Parcours (see results). In general, only the quality score is task specific and therefore Parcour specific, all other assessments can be applied to any Parcour. 

Assessments Parcours

Subjective User Feedback

Effort of the task [0-10]
Body discomfort Scale [1-8]
System Usability Scale [1-5]

all

Quality

Duration of the activity (working time)
Accuracy in task (pixel overpainting the specified line)
Weldseam quality (rating of welding by AR simulator)

 

 Car Assembly
 Car Assembly
 Welding

Electromyography (Mean muscle activity [%MVC] in combination to the movement)

M. erector spinae (during forward bending)
M. deltoideus anterior and medial (during shoulder flexion)

 

Box Handling
Car Assembly

Metabolics

Cardiac Output (by use of Impedance Cardiography)

 

Welding

Parcour Box Handling

Back-Supporting Exoskeletons for Box Handling in Logistics

© Fraunhofer IPA

Highly repetitive tasks, extern weights, and non-ergonomic postures are typical for workplaces in intralogistics and are considered as being particularly stressful for the human body, especially the lower back.

This Parcour depicts a realistic, representative task of a “band-cleaner” in an automotive plant.
8 kg packages, each marked with one of two colors, have to be picked from a table (representing a belt) and carried to one of two grid boxes 2 m away. The packages are sorted according to their markings into the grid boxes. For the transport of one package, the time is limited to 10-seconds, which is based on the rhythm in logistics of the automotive industry. A running info clock gives a rough time for sorting each package so that all 48 packages are sorted within 8-minutes. After one sorting round, the test subject has a 2-minute break during which a questionnaire is filled out related to their subjective effort and body discomfort during the work.

After the break, the test subject has to sort the packages back to the table. This process of placing 48 packages in grid boxes within 8-minutes and back to the table in the next round is repeated three times so that the total working time is 1-hour. After working for 1-hour with an exoskeleton, the subjects fill out a questionnaire about the wearing comfort and the usability of this system. After at least a 2-hour break the subject would repeat the task with or without exoskeleton (randomized).

Parcour Car Assembly

Exoskeletons for Upper Extremities for Car Assembly in the Automotive Industry

© Fraunhofer IPA

There is repetitive overhead work in car assembly and maintenance at car service garages. These tasks can cause work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the shoulders, neck, and upper extremities and, likewise, affect the precision of the work due to muscle fatigue.

Therefore, in this Parcour, tasks of an underbody assembly in an automotive plant are simulated as realistic working processes in an automotive plant. This includes assembly and disassembly tasks (for experimental practicality) 

  •     setting clips (12 clips)
  •     screwing with a battery screwdriver (16 screws)
  •     laying cables into nine cable holders (2 cables)
  •     painting lines (25 times, lines of 390 mm each)

Each individual task is performed in a given time according to the “Method-Time-Measurements” (MTM), which is common in the automotive industry internationally. Thus, time is to be respected, as well as accuracy, especially in painting lines. One working round consists of assembly and disassembly followed by a 2-minute break. After each round, the subjects complete a questionnaire about subjective effort and body discomfort during work. A total of seven rounds are completed in 1-hour. After completing the Parcour with an exoskeleton, the individual wearing comfort is assessed after the 1-hour work. A System Usability Scale (SUS) score is used related to the usability of the exoskeleton.

Between the two conditions with and without an exoskeleton, the subjects have at least a 2-hour break.

Parcour Welding

Exoskeletons for the Upper Extremities in Welding

© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA

Manual welding is an essential and challenging task in many industries. Work is often performed in a constrained overhead position or front of the body. This can cause extreme stress in the upper extremities and musculoskeletal disorders in the arms, shoulder, neck, and back.

This Parcour represents real European standard training welding tasks in which joining tasks are simulated with a state-of-the-art welding training simulator and an angle grinder simulator. The most common and economically relevant welding process MAG (metal active gas welding), is used. The tasks are composed of the test position PF stump seam rising in front of the upper body and the test position PE stump seam overhead. Each test position consists of two steps – simulated welding of a 250 mm seam and simulated weld seam grinding. The worker has to execute the tasks as accurately as possible. Both procedures (PF and PE) are repeated ten times, so there is a total of 1-hour of working. After 1-hour, the subjects complete a questionnaire about the perceived effort and body discomfort during the work. After exoskeleton usage, additional questions are asked about the wearing comfort and usability of the worn system. After at least a 2-hour break, the subject would repeat the task with or without an exoskeleton (randomized).

Parcour Bag Handling

Back-Supporting Exoskeletons for Bag Handling in Logistics

© Fraunhofer IPA

Highly repetitive tasks, extern and unhandy weights as well as non-ergonomic postures are typical for workplaces in intralogistics and are considered as being particularly stressful for the human body, especially the lower back.

8 kg bags, each marked with one of two colors, must be picked up from a table, which represents a belt or shelf, and carried over a distance of 2 m to one of two grid boxes. The bags are stacked in one of the two grid boxes according to their two different color markings. A running clock gives the subjects a rough schedule to keep to clear 48 bags within 8-minutes. After 8-minutes, the subject has a short break of 2-minutes during which a questionnaire is filled out related to their subjective effort and body discomfort during the work. Then the subject sorts the sacks back onto the table. The process of transporting the bags into the grid boxes and back onto the belt is repeated three times so that the subject works for one hour.

After working 1-hour with an exoskeleton, the subjects fill in a questionnaire about the user feedback on and the usability of this system. After at least a 2-hour break the subject would repeat the task with or without an exoskeleton (randomized).

Parcour Installation of Rail Systems

Exoskeletons for the Upper Extremities in the Installation of Rail Systems

© Fraunhofer IPA

Construction activities are considered to pose an extreme strain on the whole body due to physically demanding tasks. In particular, laying pipes or cable trays on walls and ceilings puts exceptional strain on the shoulders.

This Parcour represents an overhead installation routine of a two-part L-shaped system. The first task is a simulated drilling process by applying a defined force into a sensory drill hole using a shut-off power drill at eye-level and overhead. The subject receives visual feedback on the applied force and duration. Then the rail system is installed by first, mounting a cantilever to the wall, second, screwing a saddle flange to the ceiling, third, mounting a rail to it, and last, connecting rail and cantilever. The process, comprising drilling and installation, is performed on both the left and right sides. Eventually, rail systems are disassembled again.

One working round consists of simulated drilling, installing, and disassembling followed by a 2-minutes break. After each round, the subject fills in a questionnaire related to subjective effort and body discomfort during work. Four rounds are completed within one hour. After completing the 1-hour Parcour with an exoskeleton, the individual user's comfort is assessed. Additionally, a score of the System Usability Scale (SUS) is used to inquire about the user’s acceptance of the exoskeleton.

Parcour Drywall

Exoskeleton for Upper Extremities in dry construction

© Fraunhofer IPA

Activities in an overhead position are particularly stressful for the upper extremities and frequently cause musculoskeletal complaints.  For example, this kind of overhead work is well known in drywall construction when working with drywalls.

This Parcour represents a drywall construction and is divided into two tasks: screwing and sanding.

One round of work consists of screwing 36 screws and grinding on the wall and ceiling, followed by a 2-minute break. After each round, the subject completes a questionnaire on subjective effort and body discomfort during work. Six rounds are completed within one hour; the first and last rounds are performed with a cordless drywall screwdriver and the rounds between with a dummy.

After completing 1-hour with an exoskeleton, the user's comfort is assessed. A System Usability Scale (SUS) score is also used to inquire about the user’s acceptance of the exoskeleton. After at least a two-hour break, the subject would repeat the task with or without an exoskeleton.

Parcours Research

Our research of further Parcours includes workplaces on construction sites, car repair shops, or agriculture. You can find some impressions from the first test phases below.

Experiments in group work with upper body exoskeletons in timber construction

This Parcour is developed in Excellence Cluster IntCDC and was defined in cooperation with SchwörerHaus KG, where overhead lifting activities of heavy timber beams and repetitive demanding tasks of overhead positioning are common. Two people are working simultaneously and synchronized in the same workplace.

 

© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA

Experiments of tires change in car repair shops

In cooperation with technician students from the vocational school Wilhelm-Maybach-Schule Bad Cannstatt, a workplace of changing tires was defined and developed.

 

 

© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA

Experiments of fieldwork in agriculture.

In agriculture, it is common to work in the field to plant and pick fruits, vegetables, or seeds and then carry them in boxes.   

The task of picking, placing in a field, and carrying boxes are demonstrated here.

 

© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA
© Fraunhofer IPA

Contributing Experts

We thank all partners for their conceptional and advisory support.

  • Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Management, University of Stuttgart
  • Fraunhofer Institute of Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA
  • Dr. Hensel-Unger, AUDI AG
  • Israel Benavides, FORD-Werke GmbH
  • Mrs Richter, WELDPLUS
  • Mrs Pohlmann, SLV NORD
  • Mr Glitsch, Institute for occupational safety and health, German Social Accident Insurance
  • Mr Wischnieswski, Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Contributing Exoskeleton Manufacturers

We thank all exoskeleton manufactures so far for participation with their devices.
  • Airframe (Levitate)
  • CrayX (German Bionic System)
  • ExoBack (RB3D)
  • Hapo (ErgoSanté)
  • Hapo MS (ErgoSanté)
  • Japet (Japet),
  • Laevo Flex (Laevo)
  • MateXT (Comau)
  • Paexo Back (Ottbock)
  • SoftExo (HUNIC)
  • Paexo Shoulder (Ottobock)
  • Skelex 360-XFR (Skelex)

Learn more:

 

Results

The general results of the experiments already performed. 

 

Contributing Partners

Contributing partners as experts, exoskeleton manufactures and industries. You want to be part?

 

Impressions

Impressions and pictures of the experiments already performed.